Bijlsma et al. (2023) – Beoordeling door José

Upload 9 oktober 2024.

Inhoud

Auteurs: José Hessels
Autorisators: Nog geen autorisators.

De Beoordeling

Methode: online tool van Omni Cura Academy
Checklist:
Kwaliteit: hoog
Risico op bias: niet ernstig
Methodologie:

Databases from the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Airiti Library, PerioPath Index to Taiwan Periodical Literature, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL) were searched from inception to April 2017. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on lidocaine before nasogastric tube insertion were appraised. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) score. The modified Jadad scale was used for quality assessment. Mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and odds ratio (OR) for binary outcomes were assessed by a random effects model. Heterogeneity was determined by using the Cochran Q test and I^2 statistics. Publication bias was analyzed by using a funnel plot analysis.

Beoordeling:

Gezien de gedetailleerde methodologische aanpak, inclusief het gebruik van random-effects model, grondige data- extractie, multiple database search en gebrek aan heterogeniteit.

De Checklist

Gerelateerd

Geef een reactie